Fujifilm X-S20 vs Sony A6700 - a midrange APS-C battle in 4 specifications

[Redaktion]

Sony's US$1,399 A6700 and Fujifilm's US$1,299 X-S20 represent both manufacturers' latest stab at the midrange interchangeable lens APS-C hybrid camera. While they're similarly capable cameras, there are a few features and specifications that set them apart and make them appeal to different people.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Fujifilm-X-S20-vs-Sony-A6700-a-midrange-APS-C-battle-in-4-specifications.734853.0.html

[Mr Majestyk]

Other than similar IQ and the fact Sony simply has better AF than Fuji, in all otger areas the Fuji is a better camera. The Sony body design is simply garbage and it's a truly ugly camera with a woeful EVF and rear LCD sporting specs from 2010.It's 4 years since the A6600 was launched and this is a truly underwhelming update after so long again just focusing on video upgrades and no I don't consider the AI AF as an upgrade, it should be a given now as the tech has been around for 3 years.

[julian.vdm]

Other than similar IQ and the fact Sony simply has better AF than Fuji, in all otger areas the Fuji is a better camera. The Sony body design is simply garbage and it's a truly ugly camera with a woeful EVF and rear LCD sporting specs from 2010.It's 4 years since the A6600 was launched and this is a truly underwhelming update after so long again just focusing on video upgrades and no I don't consider the AI AF as an upgrade, it should be a given now as the tech has been around for 3 years.

I do tend to agree. The Fujifilm is a much more significant upgrade over the previous version. Also, the price difference in Europe is much more significant, I believe. That makes the Fuji even more of a no-brainer.