A user on the ChipHell forums posted unconfirmed evidence of the Intel i9-10990XE. If the post is genuine, it could mean that Intel's attempting to brute force its way to multi-core dominance with an insane 380W, 22-core, 48-thread monster CPU.
https://www.notebookcheck.net/Intel-allegedly-prepping-monstrous-i9-10990XE-with-22-cores.450160.0.html
Congratultn! WOW! A monster CPU with 22c/44t means that AMD build toy CPUs with double of space.
@ 8&8
Threadripper 3960X is the closest (24 cores) to this CPU. CB20 score is the same at only 280W, so what are you celebrating, you moron?
Having the same score doesn't mean you can get the same performance, unless your application is parallelized as well as CB20. (Sadly, this test is parallelized so much well)Get the score with less cores always means better.
@ cybort
Of course, but you have probably overlooked the 380W vs 280W part :)))
They just sacrificed efficiency for performance 380w is too much for a processor even the Xeon w-3175 has less tdp than it
lol, people should buy these at high latitude locations, it would save on the heating bills.
@ S.Yu
LOL ;D
Sure I will buy it as long as Intel will pay for my power bill. 😆
AMD: *laughs in 32+ cores*
It doesn't matter how many cores it has or how fast it is. If it cost 5x as much as the equivalent AMD processor then nobody will buy it.
@M2018
When you will see an HEDT in 10nm of intel you will cry.
@M2018
I'm a MORON you are right!
@ 8&8
I think not I, but you will cry, when you will see the prices! :)))
AMD: Laughs in **64** cores
@M2018
No, i'm still going with my jurassic processors. I'm abituated. I would like a new pc (to play Star Citizen) but i'm going with my APU A12 8800B
@ 8&8
OK, today you can not buy a "bad" CPU. We have plenty of performance :)