Quote from: Mr Majestyk on Today at 02:25:53Ah yes the bipolar criminal is all for free speech as long as it's right wing extremism or himself.

Ah yes, the free "speech" consisting of attacking a building.

Commies are beating us at our own game.  What a bunch losers the US has become

Am I uncultured as to a broader definition, or does the word "injury" suggest that the device caused overt localized tissue damage, such as burns or lacerations?

Still quite unfortunate for those affected.

Is this a blog or is it supposed to be journalism?
If it's a blog read no further...

Interventions is not a measure of performance and if you'd made any research into the safety dynamics of assisted (in this case) vs self driving (not tesla and not mercedes in this comparison), you'd know that the 'collaborative' driving approach where the vehicle does NOT pretend to drive itself keeps the driver involved and results in better reaction time and less complacency. The tesle approach were the assisted driving program pretends to drive itself and disconnects upon driver input leads to driver distraction and ultimately deaths. I'm sure you like your telsa and life on Mars will be great but this is a misleading and dangerous take.
Do better.

Quote from: John s on Today at 03:50:22This is kinda scummy. What Tesla is doing is rolling in the $7500 tax incentive which not everyone will qualify for. The payment is still in the $800 range.

I can see a few situations where this could backfire on someone.

It'd be nice if they clearly labeled that. They could even add a radio button that shows you the price without any incentives. Super scummy they don't do either of that