News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Intel Core i9-9900K shows up in 3DMark Time Spy, comfortably beats the AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

Started by Redaktion, July 28, 2018, 14:02:11

Previous topic - Next topic

Redaktion

The 8-core Intel Core i9-9900K has made its way to the 3DMark database and has scored an impressive 10,719 in the CPU only test and 9,862 when paired with the GeForce GTX 1080Ti. This score is comparatively higher than that of the AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, which posted a CPU-only score of 9,428 and a combined score of 7,570 under overclock.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Intel-Core-i9-9900K-shows-up-in-3DMark-Time-Spy-comfortably-beats-the-AMD-Ryzen-7-2700X.318704.0.html

Mynamehere

Thank you AMD for all of this. If it weren't for you, we would still be on 4/8 core i7 with 450$ price.

Vaidyanathan

Quote from: Mynamehere on July 28, 2018, 14:15:47
Thank you AMD for all of this. If it weren't for you, we would still be on 4/8 core i7 with 450$ price.
Hard to deny this fact ;)

Abbas Bhaijibhai


Erold

The i9 is supposed to be a monster. With that frequency it can beat Ryzen, I'm curious what it will do at the same speed. Also think about the price difference. Intel will never charge less than 450-500$(€) for this chip.

Vaidyanathan

Quote from: Abbas Bhaijibhai on July 28, 2018, 16:16:48
An Intel Enthusiast grade cpu comfortably beats a AMD mainstream CPU, much amaze, very wow
With the decision to restrict SMT to Core i9, I don't think Intel considers it enthusiast anymore. It is meant for mainstream adoption. Otherwise, why do you think they made H300 chipsets compatible with i9 and i7?

Mynamehere

Quote from: Erold on July 28, 2018, 17:33:42
I'm curious what it will do at the same speed.
Zen+ (meaning 2nd generation of Zen which has improved IPC compared to 1xxx series) is less than 5% in IPC compared to latest Intel uArch which is Skylake. So a 9900K at 4.35 Ghz all cores will be ~ the same as 2700X. Also, don't forget that AMDs implementation of SMT scales better compared to Intel, so at MT it might be that 4.4-4.5Ghz 9900K equals 2700X at 4.35Ghz. Pretty nice stuff indeed.

Related to pricing, yeah, probably Intel won't sell this CPU under 400$, but the difference between a 320$ 2700X and a 500$ 9900K might not be worth it. If you want MT performance you are better off with Threadripper really.


Neel Gupta


Quick Reply

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Name:
Email:
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview