News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Apple iPhone 6S Plus Smartphone Review

Started by Redaktion, October 02, 2015, 03:29:13

Previous topic - Next topic

Redaktion

Bigger and better. Sounds disrespectful, but it is just a pun. The latest Apple iPhone 6S Plus is all about the touch as part of the new handling concept called 3D Touch. The latest S model is obviously faster, and you also get better cameras as well as faster communication modules. And more weight compared to the predecessor. The new iPhone is still a great smartphone.

http://www.notebookcheck.net/Apple-iPhone-6S-Plus-Smartphone-Review.151376.0.html

sim

It baffles me how while Mate S loses at almost every aspect to the competition(except call quality and partially battery life) it could get the same total score as iP6SP, which has multiple massive advantages to the competition.

xxx

http://forums.macrumors.com/threads/which-chip-does-your-6s-6s-have.1922967/page-20
6s plus TSMC A9        geekbench  battery score 8:07:40  4876
6s plus Samsung A9   geekbench  battery score 5:36:40  3366

Joseph

Great & exhaustive review. What I like about your reviews are the depth of every topic you cover. Just love this approach unlike many other sites.

About iPhone 6s Plus, although there is a pair of better cameras, a faster processor, and a cool new user interface trick may not seem like much, these improvements really take the iPhone 6S Plus to the next level. The camera upgrades are arguably the best thing about the S update this year, but 3D Touch is a close second. You can check more such detailed review at a video channel on fanreveiews.co and specifically here for iPhone 6s Plus - https://fanreviews.co/mobiles/apple-iphone-6s-plus-2015-user-video-reviews Hope this helps.

meekz

why in this article Antutu score is quoted to be 58869, where in fact, when you look at antutu.com ranking here http://www.antutu.com/en/ranking/rank1.htm it is stated to be 132930 ???

I am sorry if the question is stupid/trivial but the discrepancy is too big not to ask.
thx

Quick Reply

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Name:
Email:
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview