Again, you don't understand the key issue - AMD doesn't have built-in USB40 ports in SoCs until the Zen4 Phoenix version. And Intel TB4 has ports built into the U / P series for a long time. Naturally, manufacturers are too lazy to install a separate expensive chip for USB40 in laptops with AMD, when in Intel they only need a cheap interfacing retimer and nothing else - all the key logic is already in the SoC. The situation is approximately the same with WLAN chips. Intel has long had a proprietary CNVi 2.0+ interface with direct access to on-chip wlan logic - AX211-level cards have only transmitters and interface logic. They are cheaper. At AMD, you need to install a full-fledged Intel AX210 card (with full logic in the chip on the card) or another manufacturer.
Again, the question here is the hidden motives of the manufacturers and who and how much "brings" them. The decisive factor is how much an AMD SoC without all this logic is cheaper than an Intel SoC in which this logic is built-in. If they are equal in price, why should the manufacturer contact AMD if the final laptop is more expensive, and due to AMD's small market share in the x86 market (which also began to decline back from 2022), large batches of SoCs from AMD (which also recognized in January 2023, which deliberately holds back the supply of the most scarce series, for the sake of overpricing and selling off stocks of obsolete series) a priori cannot be physically obtained, at a price that suits them.
As a result, we have what we have - there are a lot of models with Intel on the market in a ratio of 5 to 10 to 1, if we compare SoCs announced at the same time, i.e. one year, i.e. manufacturers have nothing to offer buyers from modern AMD series - they simply do not exist in sufficient wholesale quantities on the market at a quantity that suits them (in terms of profit). Amen!
Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
Magyar