News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro disappoints in camera tests, despite its 108 MP camera

Started by Redaktion, May 24, 2021, 23:12:06

Previous topic - Next topic

Redaktion

The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro does not have 'Ultra Premium' cameras, according to DxOMark. Instead, the device languishes way down on its leaderboard and should only be considered a 'balanced budget shooter'.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/The-Xiaomi-Redmi-Note-10-Pro-disappoints-in-camera-tests-despite-its-108-MP-camera.540822.0.html

mixedfish

DxO is a compromised website. Their reviews no longer reflect the real world usage, just simply how much they are paid. There is completely no way those Chinese manufacturers could've dominated all the other brands with zero experience with cameras.

But why stop at DxO, how many other review sites have been writing fake reviews about other phones?

I've been a long time amateur photographer, I know what a reference camera shot looks like. It was strange whenever I see some reviews floating around saying how good the photos look but to me was evidently of poor quality.

Gregzeng

Unknown to most "reviewers" is that hardware designers are not that good with software. Choose instead specialist, mature software. "Open Camera" has EIS, Zoom, etc on all cameras.  This freeware, open source application should preferably used in all reviews.  Version 1.0 is never perfect, never good enough.

Sss


Mohib

Redmi Note 10 pro doesn't have 108Mp camera rather it is provided with 64Mp.Its Redmi Note 10 pro max that has 108 Mp camera

S.Yu

It could still mean that it makes a nice back, as long as their API is fully exposed to Gcam(depends on their conscience, really). Even OOCJPG from Gcam leaves a lot of room for improvement by processing the DNG through LR instead.
Quote from: mixedfish on May 25, 2021, 05:23:09
DxO is a compromised website. Their reviews no longer reflect the real world usage, just simply how much they are paid. There is completely no way those Chinese manufacturers could've dominated all the other brands with zero experience with cameras.

But why stop at DxO, how many other review sites have been writing fake reviews about other phones?

I've been a long time amateur photographer, I know what a reference camera shot looks like. It was strange whenever I see some reviews floating around saying how good the photos look but to me was evidently of poor quality.
True. I now only go to Anandtech and GSMA for full sized samples. Generally a knowledgeable person could reach conclusions with those. There have been arguments against that too as the samples would not reflect subsequent firmware updates, but that stands for every single review on earth. Nothing could always reflect the latest software changes pushed OTA.

Quick Reply

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Name:
Email:
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview