News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

The AMD Ryzen 7 4700G holds its own against the Intel Core i9-10900K in initial benchmarks

Started by Redaktion, July 14, 2020, 13:20:10

Previous topic - Next topic

Redaktion

Initial benchmarks for the Ryzen 7 4700G are here, AMD's upcoming 65 W Renoir desktop APU. The Ryzen 7 4700G has been shown to offer upwards of 25% more performance than the Ryzen 7 4800H while being competitive against the likes of the Intel Core i9-10900K.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/The-AMD-Ryzen-7-4700G-holds-its-own-against-the-Intel-Core-i9-10900K-in-initial-benchmarks.481216.0.html

ijfsdjols

You are funny. 0.7V is the idle voltage, not in a million years you'll see 4.5Ghz full load with 0.7V. As for scores, given that zen 2 has ~5-10% higher IPC than Skylake and 5.3Ghz of the 10900K is 14% higher frequency than 4.64Ghz of the 4700G and 4700G is 7% behind in score, this means Zen 2 implementation in 4700G has ~7% higher IPC compared to Ice Lake, as expected.

Nemo7

Quote from: ijfsdjols on July 14, 2020, 13:51:11
You are funny. 0.7V is the idle voltage, not in a million years you'll see 4.5Ghz full load with 0.7V. As for scores, given that zen 2 has ~5-10% higher IPC than Skylake and 5.3Ghz of the 10900K is 14% higher frequency than 4.64Ghz of the 4700G and 4700G is 7% behind in score, this means Zen 2 implementation in 4700G has ~7% higher IPC compared to Ice Lake, as expected.

Ice Lake has a much higher IPC than Zen2.

rs

Quote from: Nemo7 on July 14, 2020, 22:28:49
Ice Lake has a much higher IPC than Zen2.
Depends. According to specint/fp Ice Lake has less than 10% more IPC compared to Ryzen 3000 desktop on average. But Renoir has much lower DRAM latencies. So, especially desktop Renoir could have a some IPC advantages over Ryzen 3000 desktop. Which decreases the IPC gap to Ice Lake.

_MT_

I doubt it maintained 65 W envelope while overclocked. ASRock is known for fudging power numbers (feeding lies to the processor to trick it into drawing more). I imagine it wasn't running on a public, production BIOS. In general, you really have to be careful when performance testing processors as motherboards can pull all sorts of dirty tricks that screw the results.

dasdasdas

Quote from: Nemo7 on July 14, 2020, 22:28:49
Quote from: ijfsdjols on July 14, 2020, 13:51:11
You are funny. 0.7V is the idle voltage, not in a million years you'll see 4.5Ghz full load with 0.7V. As for scores, given that zen 2 has ~5-10% higher IPC than Skylake and 5.3Ghz of the 10900K is 14% higher frequency than 4.64Ghz of the 4700G and 4700G is 7% behind in score, this means Zen 2 implementation in 4700G has ~7% higher IPC compared to Ice Lake, as expected.

Ice Lake has a much higher IPC than Zen2.
You can check AT review on this topic. Ice Lake is on average about 10% better IPC than Zen 2.

Quick Reply

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Name:
Email:
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview