News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Alleged Apple A14 Geekbench results show potential iPhone 12 chip clocked at 3.1 GHz outscoring all previous iPhone SoCs and even the iPad Pro

Started by Redaktion, March 16, 2020, 08:48:52

Previous topic - Next topic

Redaktion

Some extraordinary Geekbench results for a supposed Apple A14 SoC have been posted on the Weibo social network. The apparent mixture of Geekbench 4 and 5 information reveals that the chip was clocked at 3,090 MHz and features 6 cores. The hexa-core processor amassed huge test scores: 1,658 points for the single-core benchmark and 4,612 points for the multi-core test.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Alleged-Apple-A14-Geekbench-results-show-potential-iPhone-12-chip-clocked-at-3-1-GHz-outscoring-all-previous-iPhone-SoCs-and-even-the-iPad-Pro.457588.0.html


Pete Eddy

I am software engineer.  I read through the documentation that Geekbench provides on there testing methodology.  They basically use off the shelve open source libraries to do 90% of there benchmark.  They test just about any task you can do with a computer cpu, and provide a composite result.  But you can drill down and look at each individual category.

This is perfectly valid.  If anything it's unfair to the iPhone.  The iPhone includes Functionality that Intel and AMD don't include in their CPUs. The CPU benchmark alone doesn't represent how powerful the A Series processors are. They have image processor similar to a DSLR, audio dsps, they have a AI engine and none of these are tested by Geekbench.  The A Series processors have an IO processor for every source of input or output available.  A lot of stuff the X86 would handle on its own is handed off to a separate dedicated processor. 

I tend to hate on Apple for there prices, but the A series processors are that powerful. 

To know how bad intel is, just look at the Ryzen 4000 laptops using TSMC's 7nm process.  35watt units were beating Intel systems that were allowed to use 90Watts!  A 7 watt part on the bleeding edge TSMC fab could absolutely beat an Intel 45 watt part!  And Apple A series are always a node ahead of AMD. 

Quick Reply

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Name:
Email:
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview