News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Full specs and first benchmarks of the NVIDIA GeForce MX330 and MX350 — NVIDIA clings-on to Pascal even in the third iteration

Started by Redaktion, February 10, 2020, 11:00:59

Previous topic - Next topic

Redaktion

We have obtained exclusive information and benchmarks about NVIDIA's latest entry-level dGPUs for laptops — the GeForce MX330 and MX350. While the MX330 is essentially a rebranded MX250, the MX350 is based on the same GP107 chip as the GTX 1050 albeit sporting just a 64-bit memory bus and a lower 25 W TDP.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Full-specs-and-first-benchmarks-of-the-NVIDIA-GeForce-MX330-and-MX350-NVIDIA-clings-on-to-Pascal-even-in-the-third-iteration.453548.0.html



ko

Very disappointing. The MX lineup is a real scam, a MX130 GPU should not be on par with a MX150, which is on par with a 5 year old GTX 850M.

MX330 should be on par with a GTX 1050 and MX 350 with 1050 Ti. But as it is, iGPUs will very soon be making the MX lineup obsolete.

Vaidyanathan

Quote from: ko on February 10, 2020, 12:42:18
Very disappointing. The MX lineup is a real scam, a MX130 GPU should not be on par with a MX150, which is on par with a 5 year old GTX 850M.

MX330 should be on par with a GTX 1050 and MX 350 with 1050 Ti. But as it is, iGPUs will very soon be making the MX lineup obsolete.

Just wait for sometime for a tease that may change your opinion ;)

william blake

the new mx standard, mx350, is perfectly fine. they took a bigger chip and made it energy efficient.
the previous move, 150->250 was crap.
btw someone should ask lisa su where are navi radeons. 5300m? launched in november says amd website.
3 months after-zero(?) laptops with it. so what's the idea behind making a product without selling it?



jeremy

Quote from: william blake on February 10, 2020, 13:31:10
the new mx standard, mx350, is perfectly fine. they took a bigger chip and made it energy efficient.
the previous move, 150->250 was crap.
btw someone should ask lisa su where are navi radeons. 5300m? launched in november says amd website.
3 months after-zero(?) laptops with it. so what's the idea behind making a product without selling it?

It appears the 5300M is the base dGPU for the MPB16 ($2400). It's pretty funny, or sad, depending on how one views it. It apparently is a binned and slightly higher bandwidth version of the 5300M, if that makes anyone feel batter.

ProDigit

It's a totally useless dick move.
The GPUs are about as fast as a 2014 GT730.
And Pascal architecture should be heading out, and Turing should be where we're heading.
I would never take any GPU with less than 1500 cusa cores (or equivalent) serious.
They should be thinking of doubling the core count on a 2080Ti.

Spunjji

This is a real shame. I was expecting more of a boost from the switch to the larger die, but I guess either the memory bandwidth cut or the clock speed drop has hobbled it right back down to overclocked-MX150 territory.

The MX150 was a bit of a pocket rocket on release - GT 950M performance in thin-and-light devices - but by this point it's two architectures behind (to become three this year?). It makes sense from a business perspective that they'd be happy continue peddling the same stuff, it's just a shame from a technology / performance PoV.

Quick Reply

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Name:
Email:
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview