Notebookcheck

Post reply

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Name:
Email:
Subject:
Message icon:

Verification:
Anti-Spam: Bitte NBC eingeben / Please enter NBC:

shortcuts: hit alt+s to submit/post or alt+p to preview


Topic Summary

Posted by: Travis
« on: August 16, 2014, 02:28:14 »

no, I see, you reused the pics from the p34g v2 where you could. That's kinda lame.
Posted by: Travis
« on: August 16, 2014, 02:13:30 »

Whats the deal with the battery in the picture saying 47.73Wh? I thought this was supposed to be the 61Wh battery. Maybe thats why it ran less than the P34g v2. The c404 runs more power so its going to run less time, right?
Posted by: Dami1
« on: August 14, 2014, 16:59:40 »

I was hoping the 61.25 Wh battery would increase the overall runtime but this does not seem to be the case. This is very disapointing.
Posted by: Redaktion
« on: August 14, 2014, 09:26:24 »

P34G v2 v2. After we already reviewed the Gigabyte P34G v2 a couple of weeks ago, we now have a look at the similar Schenker C404 in this review update. Battery and build quality were drawbacks in the test of the original. Is the C404 better?

http://www.notebookcheck.net/Schenker-C404-Notebook-Review.123950.0.html

 
» Impressum     Sprachen: Deutsch | English | Español | Français | Italiano | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Türkçe | Svenska