Post reply

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Message icon:

Anti-Spam: Bitte NBC eingeben / Please enter NBC:

shortcuts: hit alt+s to submit/post or alt+p to preview

Topic Summary

Posted by: Mick.
« on: November 20, 2014, 13:28:54 »

To be fair it's cheap but to be honest it's nasty. I use it to run mapping such as Google maps & Osmand in the car & it struggles to keep up & the screen is just terrible. Somthing of a let down really.
Posted by: mike---
« on: October 12, 2014, 12:42:21 »

how come this one has a arm v9? and other have a arm v7 ?
Posted by: playboy
« on: September 09, 2014, 23:56:34 »

I wish I've read this review before putting my hands on this literally shity device!  >:(
Posted by: Betty Balzer
« on: July 05, 2014, 01:42:45 »

Thanks for your honesty. I am not sure what I would want to use a tablet for but the price of $159 sounds reasonable to get a start on a tablet to see what one can do. I know I would want it for email and a Google-like search engine. The GPS would be good if I didn't need to be connected to the internet on the road. A word processor would be very useful. I don't know what else I would need while traveling on the road.
Posted by: Michael2611
« on: March 23, 2014, 21:28:50 »

Posted by: Redaktion
« on: February 28, 2014, 02:18:03 »

Redundant successor? Samsung launched an entry-level tablet on the market that did not really convince us in several fields with its Galaxy Tab 3 7.0. Now, 7 months later, we have our hands on the Lite version - is it a sensible diet or simply nip/tuck madness?

» Impressum     Sprachen: Deutsch | English | Español | Français | Italiano | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Türkçe | Svenska