Post reply

Name:
Email:
Subject:
Message icon:

Verification:
Anti-Spam: Bitte NBC eingeben / Please enter NBC:

shortcuts: hit alt+s to submit/post or alt+p to preview


Topic Summary

Posted by: plop
« on: February 25, 2014, 23:57:06 »

Are you sure it's an msata ssd ?
Looks like the connector is in 3 parts.
Posted by: John S
« on: January 27, 2014, 12:11:12 »

Having bought a C720 the only dreadful thing about this inexpensive Chromebook is Chrome OS. Its still in need of far more features and flexibility. It needs more Plug and Play ability because this market the Chromebook is focused on are generally people who need support for printers, and other Peripherals. I bought my C720 at $199 which is a deal and will stay with Chrome OS only because you defeat much of the boot security when using developer mode. Too bad you have to defeat this to install Linux.
Posted by: eebrah
« on: January 17, 2014, 17:52:38 »

It is very easy (relatively) to install linux on this device and the perfomance there is good, that being said, the article is on point. This is not the best laptop out there, but it is just amazing! ... for that price.
Posted by: JohnS
« on: December 08, 2013, 01:35:07 »

I've got one of these and 100% agree with this excellently written review. The reviewer has nailed the key points.
Posted by: Andrew
« on: December 07, 2013, 21:11:58 »

ssd is not msata (((
Posted by: Paul Park
« on: December 05, 2013, 16:36:46 »

x86 makes it attractive as a Linux laptop, especially if you want to install Ubuntu.
Posted by: Redaktion
« on: November 27, 2013, 10:38:09 »

Back to basics. While efforts continue to try and rework the Chromebook equation to provide a more enticing balance of performance and build quality, Acer sees no harm in sticking to the original plan, with a budget plastic case design, an understated appearance, and an x86 chipset—all for $249. How does it compare?

http://www.notebookcheck.net/Review-Acer-C720-2800-Chromebook.105937.0.html

 
» Impressum     Sprachen: Deutsch | English | Español | Français | Italiano | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Türkçe | Svenska