Post reply

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Message icon:

Bitte das Wort check eingeben / Please enter the word the following word: check:

shortcuts: hit alt+s to submit/post or alt+p to preview

Topic Summary

Posted by: Richard
« on: July 23, 2014, 03:19:05 »

How intel HD 4400 is worse than HD 4000?
Posted by: Z510
« on: January 28, 2014, 23:24:33 »

I have a lenovo z150 can I play Battlfield 4 on it with high quality ?
Posted by: Jeanny
« on: January 12, 2014, 14:27:52 »

I am playing Battlefield 4 on Ultra setting with ASUS G750JX without problem.
Posted by: hossein
« on: November 19, 2013, 21:19:48 »

need for speed rivals please
Posted by: Paul Soh
« on: November 15, 2013, 02:29:24 »

Where's the GTX 780? Should replace the GTX 680 with that now.
Posted by: Tuen
« on: November 14, 2013, 01:10:16 »

gtx 670mx is always mentioned in the same category as gtx 670m. The gtx 670mx is a severely underclocked card, I average @40 fps @ultra 4xmsaa and doesn't really dip below 35 in that situation. 18.6fps even for stock seems too low. Sure you got the right drivers? But yea 670mx reaches 680m levels and higher easily. And gtx 770m=gtx 670mx, same card just different volt clocks.
Posted by: john
« on: November 13, 2013, 20:47:48 »

8970m crossfire????
Posted by: boon
« on: November 13, 2013, 16:22:05 »

bring back gt 650m to these benchmarks!
Posted by: Redaktion
« on: November 13, 2013, 10:14:59 »

High-gloss and polished. Most gamers know that Battlefield 4 is a feast for the eyes. But what are its hardware demands like? We tested the single-player campaign with a variety of notebook graphics cards.

» Impressum     Sprachen: Deutsch | English | Español | Français | Italiano | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Türkçe | Svenska
Diese Webseite nutzt Cookies. OK