Notebookcheck

Post reply

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Name:
Email:
Subject:
Message icon:

Verification:
Bitte das Wort laptop eingeben / Please enter the word the following word: laptop:

shortcuts: hit alt+s to submit/post or alt+p to preview


Topic Summary

Posted by: Träumerle
« on: February 18, 2015, 14:11:40 »

You can't see it because it doesn't exist
Fine. It doesn't exist, but has a wrong review.

Posted by: John
« on: February 18, 2015, 13:57:19 »

You can't see it because it doesn't exist. In this review their talking about HP Probook G0 (H0V92EA). 

You can see this review too:
http://www.notebookcheck.net/Review-HP-ProBook-470-G0-H6P56EA-Notebook.104032.0.html

Don't know why HP ignores it's own notebook on their homepage.
You should ask them.
Posted by: Träumerle
« on: February 18, 2015, 13:38:21 »

Don't know why HP ignores it's own notebook on their homepage.
You should ask them.
Posted by: John
« on: February 18, 2015, 12:20:12 »

Ok! Could you please find HP ProBook 450-H0 at official HP website and sand me a link?

Here is the HP support:
http://www8.hp.com/us/en/troubleshooting.html


I guess it's not  the review, it's you who's wrong!

1. They reviewed the HP ProBook 450-H0, you bought the 450-G0
2. In the review you can find a picture of the interface


3. Here's a picture showing sata, msata and m.2 connectors



Who's wrong?
Posted by: Träumerle
« on: February 14, 2015, 12:52:13 »

I guess it's not  the review, it's you who's wrong!

1. They reviewed the HP ProBook 450-H0, you bought the 450-G0
2. In the review you can find a picture of the interface


3. Here's a picture showing sata, msata and m.2 connectors



Who's wrong?
Posted by: John
« on: February 13, 2015, 23:09:27 »

I bought mSata SSD today for my HP 450 G0, because I read your review, and when I tried to install it I realized that your review is wrong.  >:( HP 450 G0 uses M.2 2242 SSD!
Posted by: jimFromB
« on: November 18, 2014, 17:40:37 »

Nice article. One thing I want to know is there any difference in display light intensity between hp 450 and 250. I have both laptops, but 250 have little bit darker screen. Is that a factory mistake, or something else?
Posted by: Waqas
« on: August 20, 2014, 10:01:13 »

I want to know regarding whether the HP pro book is designed to withstand heating temperatures when dedicated graphics are installed.

the hp pavillion dv series seem to suck as they overheat and my current pavillion dv model motherboard burnt twice and the hp support were clueless.

Please advise i need a good graphc card machine with amd radeon graphics but doe not burn out.
Posted by: mohamed nageeb
« on: July 10, 2014, 15:46:44 »

some users reported having wifi connection droping issues and they had to wait 30 seconds to reconnect
Posted by: fmorvan
« on: January 20, 2014, 14:27:49 »

After reviewing HP Probook 450 maintenance manual, there is no mSATA slot. The only way to install SSD is to use the optical drive bay.

Posted by: Ja No
« on: January 08, 2014, 23:34:07 »

On picture above is not mSata, mSata has two screws on side and other connector ..
This looks like M.2 NGFF connector ..
Posted by: Ja No
« on: January 08, 2014, 19:19:50 »

New version of HP ProBook 450 G1 (Haswell i3-4000M) do not contain mSata slot !!!
Posted by: TMHKR
« on: December 08, 2013, 15:20:03 »

As for the screen, you took the ProBook 470 and calibrated it - the blue cast was gone. There's no reason why it would not work on this one too. The uncalibrated grayscale charts of both 450 and 470 are pretty much the same, with clearly visible bluish readings.
Posted by: Emil
« on: October 08, 2013, 13:27:45 »

I am quite amazed that you haven't mentioned the rubber lid, this is definitely something that would attract some costumers, while drive away others... It is definitely the biggest change of the exterior since the previous generation (4540s). To be sincere, that's all that's changed since the last version! No Haswell inside or other "internal" advancements...

Another thing: battery running time of barely more that 3 hours is considered at least mediocre, not to be crude. Even you at notebookcheck have considered battery running time of 4 hrs as mediocre or average... This is horrible!
Posted by: rasyk sauliui
« on: October 04, 2013, 22:47:27 »

15.6-inch 16:9 screen with a resolution of 1366x768 pixels? It's a shame, tablets and even phones have better! Who wants to buy such, especially for business? They are stubbornly producing "crapbooks" and are surprised about decreasing market! Please, please let me have an option to buy a laptop with 16:10 or 4:3 screen and good screen resolution!

 
» Impressum     Sprachen: Deutsch | English | Español | Français | Italiano | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Türkçe | Svenska