Notebookcheck

Post reply

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Name:
Email:
Subject:
Message icon:

Verification:
Anti-Spam: Bitte NBC eingeben / Please enter NBC:

shortcuts: hit alt+s to submit/post or alt+p to preview


Topic Summary

Posted by: Nedelin Velikov
« on: October 01, 2013, 13:10:14 »

Quoted from the right-hand side column of the review: "Unfortunately, it only comes with a standard HD resolution. Nokia should have done better in this regard. Display resolution could be Full HD"

Really?! Does the reviewer know that WP8 does not support FHD displays yet? NOKIA could not have done better unless they waited for the WP8 GDR3 update, which is going to be released God knows when due to Microsoft's sluggishness. Please, put more research into the review, otherwise it comes across as a semi-baked and rushed out paper.
Posted by: gollum-s
« on: September 29, 2013, 17:15:39 »

"This is the first ever smartphone with such a high camera resolution."
What about Nokia 808?
Posted by: Redaktion
« on: September 29, 2013, 10:51:04 »

Camera or phone? With an almost absurd resolution of 41 megapixels, the Lumia 1020 ridicules the entire competition. The rest of the specs, however, have remained almost unchanged when compared to the Lumia 925. Whether its high amount of pixels remains the only advantage of the Finnish smartphone, our review will show.

http://www.notebookcheck.net/Review-Nokia-Lumia-1020-Smartphone.102528.0.html

 
» Impressum     Sprachen: Deutsch | English | Español | Français | Italiano | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Türkçe | Svenska