Samsung Galaxy S4 im Test
Exklusiv: AMD A6-1450 APU "Temash" im Test
Smartphone oder Tablet: Asus Phonepad
Multimedia-Ultrabook: Samsung 730U3E

Post reply

Name:
Email:
Subject:
Message icon:
Verification:
Anti-Spam: Bitte NBC eingeben / Please enter NBC:

shortcuts: hit alt+s to submit/post or alt+p to preview


Topic Summary

Posted by: slj
« on: March 21, 2013, 18:24:53 »

WOT 8.4 added support for NVidia SLI. Could we perhaps rerun some of these benchmarks. Note be careful on driver versions. There are still some hickups for SLI.
Posted by: Richard Brandt
« on: December 27, 2012, 05:02:23 »

remember that WOT is not optimized for multiple cores, and with quad cores having a slower clock speed than dual cores they will face a larger bottleneck than others, its not the graphics cards at fault. Wargaming just hasn't invested in a multi core engine, and thus the processor is the bottleneck for MOST mobile systems. :p
Posted by: Florian Glaser
« on: October 13, 2012, 12:18:47 »

Even with the newest nvidia-driver i get only 30 fps in maximum settings. We will probably order a fresh gtx 680m.
Posted by: Hræsvelgr
« on: October 13, 2012, 10:05:24 »

My System:
Clevo P370EM , i7-3820QM, 680M, 8GB 1600mhz Corsair, 1tb Seagate Momentus HDD 5400U/min
Nvidia Driverversion: 306.97

Fraps won't recognize Wot, so you just have to belive me.
FPS are allways between min. 50 and max 60. According to the displayed Framrate of Wot its the most time around 57-59 FPS.




Update:
Fraps Update:
Frames 9830
Time (ms) 180000
Min 39
Max 62
Avg 54.611
Posted by: Florian Glaser
« on: October 13, 2012, 01:27:30 »

We are talking about ONE game out of thousands. So i wouldn´t take the problem too seriously. By the way: One of our users will test our replay with his gtx 680m notebook. Just wait for the results.
Posted by: sid
« on: October 13, 2012, 00:53:34 »

Both Wargaming.net and Nvidia should be warned about the 680M performance failure vs the 7970M to identify whether an update could occur from either the driver or from WOT to rectify this difference. The performance of the 680M is completely out of line for WOT. Users who purchase an Alienware for WOT customization(the flashing lights) should be aware of the major difference in their choices. What is surprising is the fact that Wargaming.net gamers in Russia use Alienware heavily and didn't notice this difference in the 680M vs 7970M? ...or did they ? Its an astonishing difference. Folks getting the latest video card from Nvidia are expecting to have the best performance on wot and not be blown away from an older nvidia 675M or by the 7970M. Did the new 8.0 rendering nerf the 680M? Or was performance vs the 7970M always that bad relatively. Not only should be looking at explaining the difference between the 680M and AMD but also between the 680M and its predecessors. Degrading performance with newer top of line cards is not cool to see at all.
Posted by: Florian Glaser
« on: October 12, 2012, 22:24:50 »

I tested both GPUs (HD 7970M & GTX 680M) twice - same results. I even used a different HDD and GPU-driver. And yes, especially the FHD-result is kind of strange.
Posted by: sid
« on: October 12, 2012, 22:09:57 »

What the heck happened to your 680M tests. Based on your review : http://www.notebookcheck.net/Review-GeForce-GTX-680M-vs-Radeon-HD-7970M.77110.0.html the results of the 680M vs 675M vs 7970M for WOT make no sense AT ALL.
Posted by: Redaktion
« on: October 12, 2012, 07:28:45 »

Tanks a lot. Over 40 million registered users and a bigger E3 stand compared to many (former) top publishers: Wargaming.net shakes up the Free2Play sector with World of Tanks. In order to to investigate the ongoing trend we tested version 8.0 with a variety of notebook GPUs.

http://www.notebookcheck.net/World-of-Tanks-v8-0-Benchmarked.83065.0.html

 
» Impressum     Sprachen: Deutsch | English | Español | Français | Italiano | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Türkçe | Svenska