Post reply

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Name:
Email:
Subject:
Message icon:

Verification:
Anti-Spam: Bitte NBC eingeben / Please enter NBC:

shortcuts: hit alt+s to submit/post or alt+p to preview


Topic Summary

Posted by: Rafael
« on: September 09, 2012, 03:36:40 »

I've just finished the game on my Dell Inspiron 14 N4050, with a Core i5 2450m, HD Graphics 3000, 4GB of RAM, and it ran really good, with settings on High, Dx9, 1366x768. FPS between 20~45, very much playable. Don't know if ThrottleStop is the guy that made the difference on my case, but i'm really surprised.
 
Posted by: alphys
« on: August 10, 2012, 06:20:03 »

The price? Money wise for performance and quality. I will use a lot of wifi, movies also both online and in
Dvd hardware (if come with blue ray = ok) if I can get help Ill appreciate fellas, thanks
Posted by: alphys
« on: August 10, 2012, 06:11:34 »

So this site is not a good reference if I understand comments and video from colleague Spartan? I can only buy laptop for now and im looking to play Max Payne 3 with NO LAGS, 50 fps min. Can I grt some help?
Posted by: Sp_art.an
« on: July 22, 2012, 21:18:20 »

Max Payne 3 Gameplay video on Intel HD 3000
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9wzCJMK9fYo
Posted by: Till Schönborn
« on: July 08, 2012, 19:09:00 »

HD 6990M scores 58fps @low and 65fps @medium ? Impossible!

Different DirectX settings!

Also, HD 6970M is faster than GTX 675M, the HD 7970M is a lot more faster than any other.Nvidia cards score better fps @low/medium and worse @high/ultra.That doesn't make any sense.

Low/medium settings seem a bit CPU-limited.
Posted by: zotac
« on: July 06, 2012, 22:39:33 »

dont play mp3 on notebook buy a desktop and have fun LOL !
Posted by: xls
« on: June 19, 2012, 17:53:23 »

HD 6990M scores 58fps @low and 65fps @medium ? Impossible! Also, HD 6970M is faster than GTX 675M, the HD 7970M is a lot more faster than any other.Nvidia cards score better fps @low/medium and worse @high/ultra.That doesn't make any sense.
Posted by: Florian Glaser
« on: June 19, 2012, 13:07:57 »

I was wondering too, so i repeated the benchmark - same result. Maybe it´s the GPU-driver (296.44 vs. 295.62), maybe the CPU-Turbo worked differently...
Posted by: hfm
« on: June 19, 2012, 05:39:58 »

How did the 670M with the same CPU as the 675M score better in the two lower tests? THat doesn't seem possible...
Posted by: Redaktion
« on: June 12, 2012, 07:46:44 »

Lord of Bullet Time. After a perceived eternity, Max Payne returns to our home computer screens.  The third part was not developed by Remedy, but by GTA studio Rockstar.  Aside from strengths and weaknesses, this article illuminates game performance with various notebook GPUs.

http://www.notebookcheck.net/Max-Payne-3-Benchmarked.76043.0.html

 
» Impressum     Sprachen: Deutsch | English | Español | Français | Italiano | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Türkçe | Svenska