Notebookcheck

Post reply

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Name:
Email:
Subject:
Message icon:

Verification:
Anti-Spam: Bitte NBC eingeben / Please enter NBC:

shortcuts: hit alt+s to submit/post or alt+p to preview


Topic Summary

Posted by: Ajay Chauhan
« on: June 10, 2013, 08:59:42 »

Good to see here the comparison here. Very rare i have found comparison of such type. I just check it on http://www.androidgears.in/htc-one-s-vs-htc-one-x/
Posted by: Arpan
« on: October 07, 2012, 12:51:24 »

htc on s it's batter than the htc one x.......
  8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8)
Posted by: asdsdg sdg
« on: August 15, 2012, 16:28:02 »

I can't understand.. How is the photo quality different on both when both are said to use same camera?
Posted by: ozzy
« on: July 08, 2012, 14:10:24 »

HTC one s all the way
Posted by: Reviewer
« on: June 12, 2012, 13:46:54 »

thanks for the hint, graphs should be fixed now
Posted by: Valdemaras
« on: June 12, 2012, 10:57:04 »

Battery runtime graphs are equal - its mistake in article, could you correct it?
Posted by: CGNMUC
« on: June 10, 2012, 20:27:21 »

The main thing you are missing is that the Htc S uses the next gen krait architecture and is fabbed at 28nm while the tegra 3 uses the older arm 9 architecture and is fabbed at 40nm.

We mentioned that in our performance analysis:

"The HTC One S is a model of the upper middle-class and is equipped with a Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 (MSM8260A) dual-core System-on-a-Chip (SoC). The SoC is finished in the 28 nanometer format and the CPU cores are based on the Krait architecture."

"CPU Spy shows that the SoC usually runs at 1.4 GHz or 100 MHz. In comparison to the processor of the HTC One S, the Tegra 3 SoC is finished in the 40 nanometer format."

Kind regards
Posted by: liam
« on: June 10, 2012, 19:12:08 »

The main thing you are missing is that the Htc S uses the next gen krait architecture and is fabbed at 28nm while the tegra 3 uses the older arm 9 architecture and is fabbed at 40nm.
Posted by: username111
« on: June 08, 2012, 15:41:07 »

Considering how it performs with all those horsepower, its real-world results are quite disappointing compared to iPhone or Lumia devices.
Posted by: SuperDuper
« on: June 08, 2012, 11:07:22 »

Since they are so powerful can these phones play out to a full hd screen and can u control it with a mouse and keyboard?
Ive got a blackberry 8520 bridged to a playbook and love the mouse cursor movement of the optical trackpad in conjunction with the gestures. Need to swap the 8520 with a 9380 and then ive got a cursor enabled by the mouse pad(afaik)!
Posted by: Redaktion
« on: June 08, 2012, 09:30:08 »

One, Two, Three. At the Mobile World Congress 2012 in Barcelona, HTC introduced three Smartphones of the brand-new "One" series. We present a comparison test between the runner-up and the top dog. To be exact: the HTC One S with a dual-core CPU and aluminium case vs the HTC One X with a 4.7 inch screen and a quad-core SoC from Nvidia. Let’s fight!

http://www.notebookcheck.net/Review-HTC-One-S-vs-HTC-One-X-Tegra-3-Smartphone.75164.0.html

 
» Impressum     Sprachen: Deutsch | English | Español | Français | Italiano | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Türkçe | Svenska