Notebookcheck

Autor Thema: Review Intel HD Graphics 4600  (Gelesen 2270 mal)

Redaktion

  • Editor
  • High End NB
  • ****
  • Beiträge: 17472
  • Karma: +23/-0
Review Intel HD Graphics 4600
« am: Juni 01, 2013, 16:20:17 »
There is more in it than you think. Intel has always focused on its CPU technology which has made it the undisputed leader in the market. But the GPU has always been the foster child receiving very little love until the introduction of Ivy Bridge. We will see if the latest Haswell chips with the HD Graphics 4600 can compare to the best AMD offers on its APUs.

http://www.notebookcheck.net/Review-Intel-HD-Graphics-4600.93188.0.html

firejdhdhdhhdhdhdh

  • Gast
Re: Review Intel HD Graphics 4600
« Antwort #1 am: Juni 08, 2013, 10:00:32 »
Intel biased ovbious. Why dont you include price.

Hræsvelgr

  • High End NB
  • *****
  • Beiträge: 2784
  • Karma: +196/-15
  • De bare tenker, att de tenker
Re: Review Intel HD Graphics 4600
« Antwort #2 am: Juni 08, 2013, 10:04:30 »
prices don't make sense..
cause the grafic is included to the different processors and the price depends, on where you buy. And be sure.. no one will tell you, how much they have to pay directly to intel  ;)
« Letzte Änderung: Juni 08, 2013, 12:24:40 von Hræsvelgr »
Acer TravelMate 5720 | T9300 | HD2600 | 3GB DDR2 600mhz | 320GB HDD | BD-Player
Bj 04/2008
läuft wie am ersten Tag, ergonomische Tastatur - Dank an Acer!

Schenker XMG P722 | i7-3820QM | GTX680M | 16GB DDR3 1600mhz | 256GB SSD | 1TB HDD | BD-Player
Bj 10/2012
Schön verpackte Endlospower

TimMc

  • Gast
Re: Review Intel HD Graphics 4600
« Antwort #3 am: Juni 20, 2013, 23:35:18 »
Interesting that they compared the A10-4600 and not the A10-5800 or A10-6800. Coincidence... I think not. In another review I saw, those chips were beating the i7-4770K chip in gaming by 20-30% in framerates.

TheinsanegamerN

  • Gast
Re: Review Intel HD Graphics 4600
« Antwort #4 am: Juni 29, 2013, 23:42:11 »
"Interesting that they compared the A10-4600 and not the A10-5800 or A10-6800. Coincidence... I think not. In another review I saw, those chips were beating the i7-4770K chip in gaming by 20-30% in framerates...." show me where you can find a laptop with a 5800k.  ::)this is comparing the NOTEBOOK processors, desktop chips are not included for a reason.

a

  • Gast
Re: Review Intel HD Graphics 4600
« Antwort #5 am: November 30, 2013, 07:25:17 »
any serious gpu review will nowadays include frame rate variance. i think notebookcheck could be biased in favor of intel, because frame rate variance is intel's weakness and they are the only review site which does not show frame rate variance results.

darrell

  • Gast
Re: Review Intel HD Graphics 4600
« Antwort #6 am: Januar 24, 2014, 03:52:30 »
so is it a good card or not quit the bumble jumbo

ixo

  • Gast
Re: Review Intel HD Graphics 4600
« Antwort #7 am: Februar 22, 2014, 11:38:48 »
For video work is good , for games not too much...

Typical AMD customer

  • Gast
Re: Review Intel HD Graphics 4600
« Antwort #8 am: März 29, 2014, 16:34:32 »
I have the amd a10-4600m with the 7660g 2gb. In the comparison it showed skyrim on this setup on medium getting 29fps at 1366x720.However I can play it on high with 55-60fps easily. I'm very confused. Perhaps they have several texture mods they forgot to disable? I've only hit the sub 30fps line when trying to play on ultra. This seems Intel biased.

Bias

  • Gast
Re: Review Intel HD Graphics 4600
« Antwort #9 am: April 01, 2014, 14:19:06 »
This website is obviously Intel biased and it's nowhere more evident than in their description of AMD's Bulldozer architecture, in which they call cores not real cores due to them being in modules. The Core 2 Quads were also two modules of two cores, bet they won't say they aren't real quad cores due to sharing resources. The lists on this website should be taken as guides, not as absolute measure as the bias is thick and horrible.

Till Schönborn

  • Editor
  • Multimedia NB
  • ****
  • Beiträge: 417
  • Karma: +12/-0
Re: Review Intel HD Graphics 4600
« Antwort #10 am: April 02, 2014, 10:07:17 »
I have the amd a10-4600m with the 7660g 2gb. In the comparison it showed skyrim on this setup on medium getting 29fps at 1366x720.However I can play it on high with 55-60fps easily. I'm very confused. Perhaps they have several texture mods they forgot to disable? I've only hit the sub 30fps line when trying to play on ultra. This seems Intel biased.

Hi,

you can verify all our benchmarks using the guides and videos provided in the game checks.

Skyrim: http://www.notebookcheck.net/The-Elder-Scrolls-V-Skyrim-Benchmarks.66057.0.html

 

 
» Impressum     Sprachen: Deutsch | English | Español | Français | Italiano | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Türkçe | Svenska